Speaking at a press meeting in Siirt’s HÜDA PAR Provincial Presidency, Ramanlı stressed that the will of the people must form the foundation of any new constitutional process, warning against the influence of past military regimes.

Türkiye's current constitution, adopted in 1982 after the military coup, has long been criticized for its undemocratic foundations. Ramanlı echoed these concerns, describing the document as a "straitjacket" imposed on Turkish society. He pointed out that the constitution, born out of a period of military rule, has failed to evolve in a way that meets the needs of a modern, pluralistic society.

“If the will of the junta is to be taken as a basis even in constitution-making, it means that the will of the people is ignored,” Ramanlı said. His comments reflect the broader sentiment that the legacy of military influence on Turkish politics still overshadows the nation's constitutional framework.

The Call for a Civil Constitution

Ramanlı, representing HÜDA PAR’s stance, called for a constitution that is not only civil but also just, one that guarantees fundamental rights and freedoms. In his view, the new constitution should move beyond the authoritarian constraints of the past, offering a framework that embodies democratic values and embraces the entire society.

“The 1982 Constitution is a straitjacket put on this country,” Ramanlı argued, underlining the necessity for sweeping reforms. He advocated for a constitution that unites rather than divides, ensuring that all voices within Turkish society—regardless of political or ideological affiliation—are heard and respected.

A Pluralistic and Inclusive Process

Ramanlı’s vision for a new constitution involves a pluralistic, participatory process that includes contributions from all political parties and non-governmental organizations (NGOs). For him, the constitution must foster social consensus, rather than being shaped by narrow political or military interests.

“The new constitution should have a democratic and pluralistic structure that will ensure social consensus,” he said, emphasizing that it should be a unifying force, promoting harmony across Türkiye’s diverse population.

HÜDA PAR’s Role in the Constitutional Debate

Ramanlı made clear that HÜDA PAR is ready to contribute to the discussions around the new constitution. The party sees itself as part of a broader movement seeking to move Türkiye away from its coup-era governance model and toward a future where sovereignty genuinely belongs to the people. According to Ramanlı, any constitution that fails to reflect the will of the people risks further alienating society and perpetuating outdated systems of power.

In his final remarks, Ramanlı called for broad-based cooperation across political and civil society lines, emphasizing that the new constitution must be built on democratic principles. This, he said, is essential for fostering a sense of unity and social justice in Türkiye.

Ramanlı’s statements offer a clear critique of Türkiye’s 1982 constitution, while also providing a hopeful vision for the future. His call for a constitution rooted in the people's will, rather than that of the junta, is a powerful reminder of the importance of democracy and inclusion in any nation's foundational laws. As Türkiye debates its constitutional future, voices like Ramanlı’s will be crucial in shaping a framework that is both just and representative of the nation’s diverse population. (ILKHA)