Among the voices weighing in on this crucial matter is HÜDA PAR, a party that has articulated a clear and firm stance: the new constitution must break free from the tutelary constraints of the past and genuinely reflect the will of the people.

HÜDA PAR’s recent statement serves as a critical commentary on the constitutional reform process, emphasizing that any attempt to craft a new constitution must avoid the pitfalls of previous efforts, which have often been overshadowed by lingering influences from the junta era. According to HUDA PAR, the current constitution, though amended 21 times over its 42-year history, still falls short of addressing the country’s needs, largely because it remains rooted in outdated ideological frameworks.

The party’s critique is not merely academic; it speaks to a broader concern about the very purpose of constitutional reform. HÜDA PAR argues that if the new constitution is shaped by the same tutelary mindset that has guided past amendments, then the entire exercise would be futile. The essence of a new constitution, they argue, should lie in its ability to break away from the past and establish a legal foundation that is truly representative of the people’s aspirations and grounded in universal human rights.

This perspective challenges the status quo, calling for a complete overhaul rather than superficial changes. HÜDA PAR’s vision for the new constitution is one that embodies social consensus, prioritizes the well-being of citizens over state interests, and embraces the diverse fabric of Turkish society. Their insistence on avoiding unnecessary delays and ensuring that the reform process is not marred by manipulative tactics reflects a desire for a transparent and inclusive dialogue that involves all sectors of society.

The implications of this stance are significant. By advocating for a constitution that is not only new in form but also in spirit, HÜDA PAR is pushing for a paradigm shift in how Turkey envisions its governance. Their call for a document that unites rather than divides, and that is free from unamendable clauses that could stifle future generations, suggests a long-term vision for the country’s democratic evolution.

Beyond the constitutional debate, HÜDA PAR’s agenda touches on a range of pressing issues that further illustrate their broader concerns. From the struggles of farmers and the participation of disabled citizens in the labor force, to the fight against drug abuse and the socioeconomic challenges facing mothers, the party’s agenda reflects a deep engagement with the everyday realities of Turkish citizens. Their criticism of U.S. and Israeli policies, particularly regarding the situation in Lebanon, also highlights HÜDA PAR’s stance on international affairs, underscoring their commitment to what they see as just and equitable policies both at home and abroad.

In conclusion, HÜDA PAR’s approach to the constitutional reform process is a call for authenticity and depth in political change. Their insistence on moving beyond mere amendments to create a constitution that is genuinely reflective of the people’s will and free from the shadows of past regimes is a bold statement in Turkey’s ongoing political discourse. As the nation moves forward, the principles outlined by HÜDA PAR could serve as a guiding framework for those who seek a constitution that not only governs but also empowers its people. (ILKHA)