Human rights organizations lodged a civil suit against the Dutch government in December 2023, arguing that ongoing israeli genocide in Gaza raised compelling reasons to re-evaluate the F-35 parts export license. They presented the argument that exporting these parts could make the Netherlands complicit in war crimes committed by israel during its aggression against Palestinian civilians in Gaza.

Despite these concerns, a lower court initially sided with the government in January, allowing the transfer of US-owned parts stored in the Netherlands to proceed. However, on Monday, judges at the Hague Court of Appeals overturned this decision, issuing a more forceful stance.

Judge Bas Boele, delivering the verdict, declared the "clear risk" that exported F-35 parts could be used in "serious violations of international humanitarian law." This statement, met with cheers from supporters of the legal challenge, highlights the court's deep concern about potential consequences of the arms trade.

The immediate impact involves the government needing to cease exports within seven days, with the option to appeal the decision. However, the broader implications could be far-reaching. Some speculate this might set a precedent for other countries exporting arms to israel, while others highlight potential complexities stemming from the US role in owning the parts. (ILKHA)