Yapıcıoğlu criticizes Nation Alliance and addresses party's objectives and challenges

He addressed the distortions made by Kemal Kılıçdaroğlu and discussed various topics during an interview on Rehber TV's "Agenda on Rehber" program.

Yapıcıoğlu highlighted the recent black propaganda aimed at his party, the election process, and their objectives in Parliament.

Yapıcıoğlu acknowledged the financial burden of the election campaign but emphasized that their goal was not merely to gain parliamentary representation but to raise societal issues and national expectations.

He expressed their commitment to bring these concerns to those in positions of authority and to work for solutions beyond parliamentary authority.

Yapıcıoğlu stated that the first task of elected representatives should be to convene the Assembly and take the oath, following which they can address legislative activities.

He emphasized that their purpose in participating in the elections was to amplify the nation's expectations and demands within Parliament, and he expressed hope in tackling the nation's problems effectively.

Yapıcıoğlu further stated that they would support any suggestions benefiting the country and the nation, regardless of their origin.

He emphasized the need for a new civil constitution, expressing disappointment that it hasn't received sufficient attention in political agendas. Issues such as youth, family, education, and recurring economic challenges were also highlighted as priorities.

Yapıcıoğlu pledged to stand against anything detrimental to the nation and country, focusing on honest and transparent policies that prioritize the nation's interests over personal and party interests.

Regarding the attacks on HÜDA PAR, Yapıcıoğlu argued that the intense criticism was an attempt to target President Erdogan through their party and faith. He explained that those who oppose their beliefs and philosophy hesitate to attack their faith directly and instead attack through them, amplified by other motives.

Yapıcıoğlu mentioned remote sources instigating attacks, referring to Qandil and Pennsylvania, which he claimed have hostile intentions towards HÜDA PAR due to their beliefs and stance.

He accused them of attempting to shape Kurdish society into a secular and faithless one, propagating their own ideology of communism among the Kurds.

Yapıcıoğlu revealed that prior to the attacks, only 15 percent of the public was aware of HÜDA PAR, but the extensive criticism raised awareness significantly.

He mentioned conducting a survey and highlighted how their party program became one of the most searched keywords after the attacks.

Yapıcıoğlu stood firm on their decision not to prioritize personal or party interests in the elections and expressed his commitment to keeping their word. He subtly criticized Kemal Kılıçdaroğlu by stating that their word was different from his. (ILKHA)